Susan Bright said of Wooodman’s work “It is difficult not to read Woodman’s many self-portraits – she produced over five hundred during her short lifetime – as alluding to a troubled state of mind. She committed suicide at the age of twenty-two.”
(Bright, 2010, p.25)

Reflection
When viewing Woodman’s images I do find them disturbing. They have a dark, moody and chaotic appearance. I am reminded of Diane Arbus who’s images of societies marginalised groups also had a rather uncomfortable feel about them. Diane Arbus also committed suicide, so is this need or drive to produce images that shock or disturb the senses an indicator of “troubled” mental health? 
Woodman’s handwriting is included in a number of her images. Handwritten notes to her boyfriend and even scrawled on walls. Her writing style shares that chaotic appearance. There is no apparent effort to achieve uniformity or even correct spelling. Some of the messages to her boyfriend might also suggest low self esteem?

Woodman is well known for including herself, often naked or partially clothed in her images. This alone isn’t uncomfortable viewing but he way in which her images present her form is. In this age of the selfie there are billions of self portraits on social media where the photographer / model is doing their utmost to display themselves as perfectly as they possibly can. Such images expose the ego and narcissism inherent in our human makeup. When photographing yourself is it not normal to want to present the best version? Does deliberately depicting oneself in a unflattering or dismissive way suggest struggles with esteem or sense of self? I believe that to depict yourself in this way is antithetical to ego or self worth and this could be considered by Bright as “a troubled state of mind”.

It is a matter of historic fact that Woodman killed herself at the age of 22 and this leads us (somewhat by the nose) to reach a retrospective conclusion that Woodman was a tormented soul and she used photography to express her pain.
But her parents would state otherwise and they, if anyone, would have known Woodman better than any art critic. In their interview in the Guardian they tell the story of a young (very young) hard working talented artist. One that modelled her own images because it made sense to do so as it meant she was unrestricted by the availability of others and unhampered by the need to convey her ideas verbally to a model. They dismissed the art establishment’s reading of her images as a representation of feminism and pointed to the witticism and humour in her work. They described her life in this way; “she wasn’t a “deeply serious intellectual”; she was witty, amusing. “She had a good time,” says Betty. “Her life wasn’t a series of miseries. She was fun to be with. It’s a basic fallacy that her death is what she was all about, and people read that into the photographs”
Without hesitation I accept Woodman’s parents viewpoint. Woodman’s work appeared dark, but we should be looking not at the darkness but at how she manipulated and managed light. Her inclusion of herself in her images is well explained and has an authentic ring. I agree with her parents that we tend to focus upon her untimely end and allow that to colour our perception of her life.
References
Tate (n.d.) Francesca Woodman 1958-1981 [online] Tate. Available from: https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artists/francesca-woodman-10512. Last accessed 07/05/2020
Levy D (2018) Francesca WoodmanVanishing Act [online] Tate. Available from: https://www.tate.org.uk/tate-etc/issue-43-summer-2018/francesca-woodman-vanishing-act-deborah-levy. Last accessed 07/05/2020
Cooke R. (2014) Searching for the real Francesca Woodman [online] The Guardian. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2014/aug/31/searching-for-the-real-francesca-woodman. Last accessed 07/05/2020
o ego.
















