2.1 The Dad Project vs The Country Doctor

Linear storylines have often been used in photo essays, telling a story chronologically from an insider’s point of view. In 1948 W. Eugene Smith made a photo essay for LIFE magazine. Country Doctor chronicles the ups and downs in the life of general practitioner Dr. Ernest Ceriani from Colorado over 23 days: http://time.com/3456085/w-eugene-smiths-landmark-photo-essay-country-doctor/[last accessed 27/08/2019]

The chronological picture or photo essay is something that is often repeated in contemporary photography and can be very compelling, like Bryony Campbell’s work documenting her father’s death from cancer, The Dad Project (2009) http://www.brionycampbell.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/ The_Dad_Project_Briony_Campbell.pdf [last accessed 27/08/2019]

Both photographic essays have been presented as chronological studies of the life, and in the case of the The Dad Project death, of an individual but they are very different works.

Viewing images from The Country Doctor feels you are looking at stills from an old black and white film. The camera positioning leads the viewer to feel like a spectator, in a similar way to a television programme or film appears as a window through which you are watching the action unfold. The close up images bring you closer to what is happening but you remain separate from it.  Contrastingly, the Dad Project manages to shrug of that Journalistic style. The work feels intimate and conveys feelings. Each image communicates far more information and emotion than is presented in the frame.

When photographing The Country Doctor, Eugene Smith did so as a 1948 documentary photographer for Life magazine. This period in time would have affected the style of the photography and the magazine’s requirements would have affected the presentation of the images. It is likely that the images would have been edited by the magazine to create the story that they wished to portray, so there is no guarantee that the final essay was chronologically accurate. Some of the images work together to create short stories. These groups of images could be presented out of sequence from Smith’s original chronology without really damaging the context of the essay.

Finally the work in its entirety captures a 23 day snapshot in time. It conveys to the viewer that there would have been time beforehand. I.E. The doctor was a well established professional in a community the he knew. The viewer is also aware that there would be time afterwards in which the doctor would continue to treat his patients and potentially they could revisit in the future.

The Dad Project differs from this as it presents a finite work. There is a chronological ending and the viewer is taken on a very intimate and sensitive journey to that end. In this case the viewer is not left with the feeling of the opportunity to return to the story but is left contemplating and reflecting upon the profundity of the event.

Bryony Campbell’s use of metaphors such as the stain on the carpet or the glass and straw convey meaning beyond the frame. They achieve this because they are positioned within a context already created by earlier images in the series. The viewer  mentally places the image within this context and assumes the circumstances surrounding it. The inclusion of herself in the frame helps to create intimacy, the viewer witnessing her vulnerability and pain.

Campbell’s comment about an ending without an ending is open to the interpretation of those who have viewed her work. I took from it that she meant that her life would continue, the grief would eventually diminish and she would carry on with both the void which has been left by her fathers passing and her cherished memories of his life.

As someone who has lost both parents I recognise that my perception of the work will have been affected by my own experiences. I found it a very moving work and at times I was reduced to tears. 

From 250 to 14 Images (my selection workflow)

When photographing people in a reportage style I take a lot of images. It is important to capture the emotion of the moment and it can be easily lost if the subject of the photograph is blinking or the expression on their face is not right.

For my first assignment in the Context and Narrative unit I took approximately 250 images, these images were eventually distilled down to approximately 14. To achieve this  I applied the same workflow that I use for the majority of my work. It flows something like this:

  1. Import the images from the SD card onto the computer hard drive.
    1. Use Adobe Lightroom importer and catalogue to store the images in an appropriately named folder, such as: Pictures/Photography Coursework/PH4CAN 1/The Photograph as a Document/A1 Two Sides of The Story/
    2. Rename the images to reflect the subject (Subject Name (HK) – 001 etc.) this is a new step suggested by my tutor.
    3. Add the files to a new collection with a recognisable name and sync the collection with the Adobe Cloud so that I can access or edit the images from other devices.
  2. Print (to JPEG) all of the images as a contact sheet and save in the same file structure.
  3. Cull any poor images, such as those where the focus has been missed or the subject is blinking etc.
    1. Double click the first image and then using arrow keys to go through every image. Images that meet the “poor” criteria mark for deletion (“x” key)
    2. Complete the cycle twice, reviewing the decisions and then delete the images.
  4. Repeat the process using the star ratings to identify possible selections
    1. Use the number keys 1 through to 5 to markup each image according to the following key: 3 stars = Possible  4 stars = Good  5 stars = Best
    2. When marking up the images consider the brief and how each image might suit it.
    3. Repeat the cycle several times to be sure that the selection is correct
  5. Filter out all but 5-star images and review them again as above.
    1. Be ultra-critical. Any that may not make final images reduce to 4 stars until you have a small number of final images.
    2. Sleep on it
  6. Consider the brief and review the final images in the context of the brief.
    1. Further refine the final images.
    2. Review the 4-star images and look for any the might be promoted. Consider how these images might add further interest to the essay or improve upon it.
    3. Review the 3-star images and look for any that might be promoted.
    4. Sleep on it (time permitting)
  7. Edit the “final Images” in the develop module
  8. Export the final images as JPEGs into a subfolder to the original entitled “Finals”
    1. I have created a preset save function to do this which sizes the images to OCA recommendations

I have found that it is easier at the initial stage to remove images that you don’t want to use rather than choose those that you do. It is far faster and it is easier to be highly critical than it is to choose “best” images.

I have stopped documenting my workflow here at the point at which the images could be used on my Blog posts. For images that are to be printed I have a separate workflow which includes image proofing, further editing and test printing for colour matching.

 

 

 

Paul Seawright – Sectarian Murders.

https://holliwomble2.home.blog/

Brief

Research point: Look online at Paul Seawright’s work, Sectarian Murders.

  • How does this work challenge the boundaries between documentary and art? Listen to Paul Seawright talk about his work at http://vimeo.com/76940827 [accessed 24/02/14]
  • What is the core of his argument? Do you agree with him?
  • If we define a piece of documentary photography as art, does this change its meaning?

Findings

Paul Seawright is a Professor of Photography and Head of the Belfast School of Art at the University of Ulster. His work is held in many museums and he has written multiple books on photography.

Seawright’s work Sectarian Murders revisits some of the sites of Sectarian attacks that took place close to where he grew up in the 1970s. He provides context to each of the images by using clips of the editorial from newspapers of the time.

I found Seawright’s work challenged my idea of what constituted fine art photography. The images do not appear to be carefully composed, they appear in the main to be snapshots of the fairly unphotogenic areas of Belfast. The images are at times uncomfortable viewing but I am uncertain how much of that is created by the context supplied by the newspaper clips, or by my own recollection of the reporting of events at that time.

At first viewing, I could only see the documentary nature of the images, the obvious message being “these are the sites of historic sectarian murders”. When I began to see these images as art was when I recognised how they were conveying to me far more than the initial message. I noted that these locations include scenic locations as well as decaying, economically deprived areas. Overall the images capture the poverty and social conflict of the time. I started to reflect on how the victims felt and what they would see at the time of their death. I remembered the locations and the people that I met on my visits to Belfast in the 1990s which contrasted so strongly with the reported atrocities of the time.

Considering Seawright’s core argument that documentary photographs need to convey their message very quickly because they will not be viewed for very long. That there will be an obvious meaning within an equally obvious context that can be manipulated by the photographer or the editor to direct the viewer to what they want them to see or understand. I agree with him.

I also agree that fine art photographs, much like paintings from some of the old masters, allow the viewer to take their own meaning from the image. I believe that ultimately you may uncover a similar meaning to that intended by the photographer but you may not.

Where I struggle with a clear definition, as offered by Seawright, is that many of the “fine art” images we see today were originally created as a documentary photograph. Dorothea Lange’s image “Migrant Mother” which was created whilst she worked for the FSA is a very well known documentary image that is now considered fine art.

By taking a documentary image and redefining it as fine art there is a risk that the original meaning of the image will change. By changing the external context the viewer’s response to the image will change. A documentary photograph’s meaning will be affected by the publication or media that it is shown in. It will be affected by the time that it is published. Events of the time or social background of the viewer will change how the viewer interacts with the image.

By removing much of the original context the fine art image will become something else. However, if the viewer is aware of the original context to the image, some of the original meaning may be experienced but there is a risk that it will be diluted, either by time or the viewer’s life/social experience.

Bibliography

Seawright. P. (2019) Paul Seawright. [Online] Available from http://www.paulseawright.com Last Accessed 18/06/2019.

Furness L. (2012). Art vs Photography My Photo-philosophy and Inspirations. [Online].  Furness Photography. Available from http://www.furnessphotography.com/blog/art-versus-documentary-my-photo-philosophy-and-inspirations. Last accessed 18/06/2019.

Colour and Street Photography

Brief:

Do some research into contemporary street photography. Helen Levitt, Joel Meyerowitz, Paul Graham, Joel Sternfeld and Martin Parr are some good names to start with, but you may be able to find further examples for yourself.

  • What difference does colour make to a genre that traditionally was predominantly black and white?
  • Can you spot the shift away from the influence of surrealism (as in Cartier-Bresson’s work)?
  • How is irony used to comment on British-ness or American values?

Research:

Early adopter’s of colour photography include Saul Leiter, who is one of my favorites and Ernst Haas. Both were experienced, professional photographers, making a living from commercial (black and white) photography before embracing colour film. In the sixties and early seventies colour was not accepted for documentary or “serious” photography. It was regarded by many as being too close to advertising and distanced from the reality of the moment. Saul Leiter’s early colour work was purely personal images that he captured for his own pleasure. Leiter experimented with colour. One exaple of this is his using overheated or aged film stock. His photobook “Early Colour” showcases the results.

Where Leiter’s colour images used soft and muted tones Haas used far more saturated colours and more contrast. Some of Haas’ work is showcased on the website: http://ernst-haas.com/homepage/ 

  • What difference does colour make to a genre that traditionally was predominantly black and white?

From the sixties through to the beginning of the eighties colour photography was the domain of amateur snapshots and advertising. Bate (2009) stated “The argument in documentary cinema as much as in documentary photography was that colour was “too easy”, “superficial” and “cosmetic”, too close to advertising (as openly fake).”

It took until the eighties for colour to make it into the documentary photography. I remember the first newspaper coming into print called “Today” with colour images. I believe that the newspaper failed in the nineties, but by then other newspapers had followed Today’s lead and adopted colour printing. I remember how odd it seemed to have colour pictures in a newspaper and I would have to agree at that time that colour images carried less gravitas. Today this has completely changed. Colour images are the norm.

The images of Leiter and Haas show “how” street photography embraced the use of colour. Colour has the ability to lead the eye, the reading of colour images is very different from monochromatic ones. When used correctly it adds to an image even perhaps making the viewing experience more enjoyable. Haas’ images of bullfighters in his collection “motion” puts colour to great use, pull our eyes towards the swirling of the cape. Our eyes seem drawn to vibrant colours especially the red tones.

  • Can you spot the shift away from the influence of surrealism (as in Cartier-Bresson’s work)?

Cartier-Bresson’s “decisive moment” photography created images that conveyed a meaning beyond the image itself. His images have an almost staged feel due to his eye for the geometry that is so appealing to the viewer. Many of his images show humour others capture emotion. They are all very slickly composed.

I considered the question, if Cartier-Bresson’s images had been taken with colour film would the compositions feel as perfectly created? I doubt that they would. These images were made in monochrome, monochrome excludes the distraction of colour and allows the viewer to observe the subjects and the geometry just as Cartier Bresson had intended. Imagine the brightly coloured poster in “Derrière la Gare Saint-Lazare” it would have ruined the image, distracting from the subject and his decisive moment of suspension above the puddle.

Helen Levitt’s colour work is different from Cartier Bresson’s in two obvious ways; Firstly her style is a much straighter documentary style. She appears to be recording her surroundings rather than looking for a decisive moment or a scene in which she waits for the right person to come along. Secondly she uses the colours in the scene to creative effect, and she is equally careful not to allow colour to detract from her subject.

These differences are not a surprise. Colour street photography is very different to monochrome because of the strong colours present in everyday life. Compositions must take account of colours and the effect that they will have on our perception. The “Decisive Moment” has become less fashionable today and Levitt’s colour work reflects this. Her images remind me more of Robert Frank’s “The Americans” but in colour with their gritty realness.

  • How is irony used to comment on British-ness or American values?

We are seriously good at irony here in the UK. Verbal and situational irony is intrinsic to our sense of humour and daily communication. Social media is overflowing with ironic memes poking fun at politicians, celebrities and anyone who really ought to know better.

Examples of ironic street images taken from google images include:

References/Bibliography:

Blott. U. (2018). Isn’t it ironic?. [Online] Mailonline. Available from:  https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-5234441/Hilarious-pictures-irony-best.html. Last Accessed 08/06/2019.

Forbes. T. (2013). The role of colour in photography. [Online]. The Art of Photography. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6y9PUB69VM

Forbes. T. (2013). Saul Leiter. [Online]. The Art of Photography. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RJdIJkt3Gz8. Last Accessed 08/06/2019.

Haas E. (2019) Homepage. [Online]. Ernst Haas Estate. Available from: http://ernst-haas.com/homepage/. Last accessed 08/06/2019.

Kim. E. (2019). Henri Cartier-Bresson was a Master Surrealist Painter. [Online]. Eric Kim Photography. Available from: http://erickimphotography.com/blog/2017/12/25/henri-cartier-bresson-was-a-master-surrealist-street-photographer/. Last Accessed 08/06/2019.

Kim. E. (2019) 7 lessons Helen Levitt taught me about street photography.  [Online]. Eric Kim Photography. Available from: http://erickimphotography.com/blog/2014/06/06/7-lessons-helen-levitt-has-taught-me-about-street-photography/. Last accessed 08/06/2019.

Leiter. S. (2016). Early Colour. Fr Ed. Gottingen: Steidl.

Leiter. S (1957) Red Umbrella. [Online]. Museum of Fine Arts Boston. Available from: https://www.mfa.org/collections/object/red-umbrella-499028. Last Accessed 08/06/2019.

Levitt H. (2008). Helen Levitt 2nd Edition. [Online] Powerhouse Books. available from: http://www.powerhousebooks.com/books/helen-levitt-2nd-edition/. Last Accessed 08/06/2019.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Do images of war provoke change?

https://holliwomble2.home.blog/

Brief:

Do you think images of war are necessary to provoke change? Do you agree with Sontag’s earlier view that horrific images of war numb viewers’ responses? Read your answer again when you’ve read the next section on aftermath photography and note whether your view has changed.

My Initial View:

[CAUTION] this article contains a graphic image that some people may find upsetting or disturbing.

In short No! In my limited experience of the times when our country has been at war the photographic evidence from that war, whether action or aftermath has stirred the social conscience but society had very little to do with any decision regarding war. I watched both Margaret Thatcher and Tony Blair take us to war. In both cases “the people” did not have a say. We had no say in when the wars ended either. My personal perspective is that I shied away from the terrible images of war shown on television news because they were upsetting to see yet I was powerless to do anything about it.

I agree with Susan Sontag’s opinion that our species suffer from “compassion fatigue” or numbness when continually confronted with images of death, destruction, violence or natural disaster. In a very short space of time, it seems that everything exists has been photographed at least once. In fact, everything that exists has probably been photographed numerous times. Such is society’s need for stimulation that from one “terrible” image to the next we demand “better”, be that more detail, more suspense or more horror and when better isn’t possible we turn to the next best thing – “more”.

Compassion Fatigue appears now to also have become a possible medical diagnosis. (Carter S. B. 2014) This use of the term is different from Susan Sontag’s in that Carter describes the compound effects of the stressful life we live in the world of 24/7 news and media and how this impacts our entire life. Upon reflection, I wonder if this numbness and ability to normalise abnormal sights, events or positions is part of being human. It protects us from distress and helps us to function in difficult moments of our lives. Perhaps it is this capacity and our ability to adapt that has made us such a successful species? The medical diagnosis of compassion fatigue appears to address those of use for whom the natural protective response to one situation followed by several more accumulates to overburden us.

The image below, of 7 year old Jewish boy Sieg Maandag walking through the Bergen-Belsen Concentration Camp past lines of dead bodies, apart from showing us the appalling things that we humans can do to one another,  demonstrates just how we are able to become numb to and to normalise the atrocities we see in order to survive. This boy was well aware of his surroundings but he had come to accept them.

90
A small boy strolls down a road lined with dead bodies near the Bergen-Belsen concentration camp, 1945.
George Rodger—The LIFE Picture Collection/Getty Images

As I view this image today seventy years after the event from my relatively cosseted comfortable existence I am truly horrified and struggle to look. But I recognise that if I was confronted with another image and another on a daily basis I would eventually normalise the scene as did this young boy.

References:

Sontag, S. (1973) On Photography. Kindle Edition. Picador. New York.

Klingenstein, S (2014). Zero Hour. [Online] The Weekly Standard. Available from: https://www.weeklystandard.com/susanne-klingenstein/zero-hour. Last Accessed 30/05/2019.

Carter, S.B. (2014). Are You Suffering from Compassion Fatigue? [Online]Psychology Today. Available from: https://www.psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/high-octane-women/201407/are-you-suffering-compassion-fatigue. Last Accessed 31/05/2019.

Cosgrove, B. (2013). At the Gates of Hell: The Liberation of Bergen-Belsen, April 1945. [Online] Time Magazine. Available from: http://time.com/3679103/at-the-gates-of-hell-the-liberation-of-bergen-belsen-april-1945/. Last Accessed 31/05/2019.

Charity – Martha Rosler

https://holliwomble2.home.blog/

Brief:

Martha Rosler believed that the social conscience of well-meaning photographers such as Lewis Hine was not helping the social situation because it reinforced the gap between rich and poor. She argued that the need for the poor to rely on the rich for sustenance and social change is not beneficial in the long term and that it’s simply a way of reinforcing hierarchical structures imposed by capitalism.

“…which political battles have been fought and won by someone for someone else?” (Rosler (1981) in Bolton, 1992, p.307)

 Research:

Two of the documentary photographers referred to by Rosler who both photographed the poor in the late 1800s and early 1900s were; Lewis Hine and Jacob Riis. Each had a very different approach to their subject matter and offered different perspectives to their viewers.

Jacob Riis (1849 1914) “His (Riis’) work highlighted a world which was unseen by many of his readership “Riis was determined to show his readers that the vast majority of the poor were normal, hardworking people facing enormously adverse circumstances. As he visited the slums of New York, Riis made an effort to learn more about the various issues the poor faced, from the spread of disease to crime to overcrowding.” (eNotes.com.2019)

Jacob Riis’ book “How the Other Half Lives” combined his expose style of photography with moral and radical text. Martha Rosler’s opinion of such documentary photographers may well apply to Jacob Riis’ work. Riis produced images that were of a sensationalist nature (Bate.2009) and his work alone did not achieve any improvement in the lives of the people he photographed despite that being one of his aims. However, his work is recognised as the start of documentary photography. (Clarke 1997) And later documentary photography achieved far more.

Lewis Hine (1874-1940) reportedly declared himself as a “sociological photographer” (Clarke. 1997) Hine also photographed the poor, including; children working in factories, sweatshops, immigrants, etc. but he published his work in order to campaign for change. In describing Hine’s work Clarke wrote: “The figures remain ascendant, free of the propagandist or polemic intentions on the part of the photographer.” I see Hine’s work as “straight” photography rather than being artificially nuanced or created for effect. I would describe Hine’s approach as “outsider” photography although he still retains the trust of those that he photographed. Lewis Hine’s work is cited as helping to change child labour laws. (The Guardian. 2018)

My thoughts on Martha Rosler’s essay are complex. Rosler’s essay was written in 1981, almost 100 years after Riis’ infamous book was published. I think that the context in which we view these images is very different now to what it would have been at the time. Yes, there are essays written closer to the time but even these would only be the opinion of the writer. So, who is the most valid? The opinions of the writer or the opinions of the original photographer, or perhaps the editor of any publication that the images were seen in?

Rosler’s perspective appears to be entirely photography-centric, but I believe that it is the social structures and the perspective of different social classes that provide contextual “reality” and this would have been an experienced reality, clearly understood by most with or without photography. Any gap between the wealthy and the poor was there already and photographing it would have been unlikely to reinforce it.

Rosler’s argument is that the images are voyeuristic for upper-class consumption, but such voyeurism is only possible if a social class and wealth divide existed. Surely the wealthy classes were somewhat aware of the deprivation and suffering of the poor, even if the detail was not. Photography worked by bringing such issues to the forefront of societies consciousness in all of its gritty and uncomfortable details. Nevertheless, nothing seen would have come as a complete surprise to many, for daily life would bring the classes together, albeit on neutral ground with neither really venturing into the other’s territory.

A modern-day facsimile to this style of documentary photography are images taken from inside slaughterhouses or meat processing plants. Vegetarian/vegan interest groups will publish images in a sensationalist style, the meat industry, on the other hand, will publish very different ones. As a society, there are many people who will use one set of images or the other to justify and reinforce their beliefs. But the majority will recognise that there is truth in both positions and probably just try and distance the images from their thoughts. I doubt that the human condition has changed so much in 100 years, or that our thought process has evolved to such a high plane that we respond much differently now as to how we did then.

I would suggest that Riis and Hine’s photography exposed, highlighted, or brought clarity to the issues created by poverty. The term reinforcement suggests a shoring up or strengthening of the barriers between social classes rather than help break them down. Here, history demonstrates quite clearly that the severe differences between living standards of the social classes of the late 1800s and early 1900s no longer exist. Documentary photography has been recognised by many as helping with that change.

Rosler wrote her essay in 1981. She published a set of images in 2011 entitled “Greenpoint Project”. Her images are not sensational like Riis and not propaganda like Hine, but there is a similarity. Rosler shows us images of people from a poorer part of New York City. The images are personal, an insider’s perspective. They say to me “this is how it is” But isn’t the lack of shock or discomfort simply because the gap between wealthy and poor has diminished and most of society now sits in the comparatively comfortable middle ground. I am compelled to consider what if Rosler was born in the 1800’s? What would the context of her photographs have been then? Finally, I suggest that there are people in this world of sufficient wealth that for them Rosler’s images would be consumed in a voyeuristic way.

The bigger discussion rather than the debate over Riis and Hine’s work should be about society and the human condition in general with its inherent complexity and social intransigence. These problems far outweigh the impact of a small number of photographic images. That being said, you have to start a journey from somewhere. Riis and Hine were there at the beginning of a movement whose momentum grew over time to a point where society was changed for the better.

References:

Bate,D. (2009). Photography the Key Concepts. 1stEdition. Oxford: Berg

Clarke, G. (1997). The Photograph. 1stEdition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

eNotes Editorial. (2019) How the Other Half Lives – Overview. [Online] eNotes PublishingEd. eNotes.com, Inc. eNotes.com. Available from: http://www.enotes.com/topics/how-other-half-lives#overview-overview-1. Last Accessed 30/05/2019.

The Guardian. (2018). The photos that changed America: celebrating the work of Lewis Hine [Online] The Guardian Newspaper. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/gallery/2018/feb/15/lewis-hine-photographs-child-labor-ellis-island. Last Accessed 30/05/2019

Rosler, M. (1981)  In, around and afterthoughts (on documentary photography) [Online]. available from: http://web.pdx.edu/~vcc/Seminar/Rosler_photo.pdf. Last Accessed 30/05/2019.

Rosler, M. Photos and Photomontages. [Online] Martharosler.net. Available from: http://www.martharosler.net/photo/index.html. Last accessed 30/05/2019.