Record a real conversation with a friend. (It’s up to you whether you ask permission or not!)
Before listening to the recording, write your account of both sides of the conversation. Then listen to the recording and make note of the discrepancies. Perhaps there are unfinished sentences, stammers, pauses, miscommunications etc.
Reflect upon the believability of re-enacted narratives and how this can be applied to constructed photography. What do you learn from the conversation recording process and how can you transfer what you learned into making pictures?
Lessons Learned
Upon replaying the conversation I recognised that whilst I had my own interpretation of the discussion and the salient points, actually more things were discussed than I had remembered. Whilst I hadn’t remembered all of the detail I felt that the conversation was relaxed and enjoyable. I felt good afterwards.
Reflection
My understanding was based on a real time conversation. We have conversations every day and take for granted what is a complicated process. It takes concentration and a lot of brain power to keep track of a conversation thread whilst we translate the words into meanings, recognise and understand inflection, tonal changes, hand gestures and facial expressions.
The process of understanding the dialogue requires cultural and linguistic knowledge. Our understanding of language includes embedded semiotic codes such as; semantic codes which describe a hidden but generally accepted meaning or symbolic codes, denoting or connoting an object or its qualities.
With all this going on it is not surprising that we don’t remember everything that is said during a conversation. We latch on to what we think are the main points, but these are affected by our perspective or point of view. Our perspective is created from our lived experience, it is the sum total of all our memories and experiences. It is further affected by our current surroundings and circumstances.
The process of re-enactment relies upon a recognition or understanding of an original event or object. All such understanding is, however, flawed due to the above. Technically no re-enactment will ever be an accurate depiction of an original.The use of Semiotics within the constructed or re-enacted image is a good method for creating narrative within the tableau. In addition to the semiotic codes mentioned above , visual codes include Proairetic (or action codes), and Hermeneutic Codes (or Enigma Codes) can also be used.
A re-enacted narrative within photographic art leverages our process of understanding. It recognises that our perception at any point in time is influenced by our individual perspective. When viewing the still image each viewer’s perception will be different. If a photographic image is presented in the form of a triptych, a series of images displayed on a gallery wall or within a book, our appreciation of each image is affected by our understanding of the preceding, thus creating narrative across set. The images in Robert Frank’s book The Americans are presented in a particular order and the viewer requested to view them accordingly. Jack Kerouac likened the order of the images to a visual poem.
Where cinematic re-enactment of historical events might be broadly accurate the viewer understands that much of the underlying detail will be fictional. Nevertheless we accept the story and we are drawn into the narrative. We apply our own emotional and moral perspective, resulting our rooting for the hero, disliking the villain and feeling empathy for the characters. The same perspective can be applied to the still image.






















