Read the section entitled ‘The Real and the Digital’ in Wells, L. (ed.) (2015)
Photography : a critical introduction. (Fifth edition.) London, [England] ; New York,
New York: Routledge. pp.92–95. At:
https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucreative-ebooks/detail.action?docID=196
8918
Does digital technology change how we see photography as truth?
Consider both sides of the argument and make some notes in your learning log.
What was your idea of documentary photography before you worked on
Part One? How would you now sum it up?
What are the differences between documentary, reportage,
photojournalism and art photography?
Reflection:
The idea that photographs provide irrefutable evidence of reality has long since disappeared from our social consciousness, thanks in the main to the ubiquity of mobile phone camera apps and photo editing software. Such is the expectation that celebrity portraits or fashion model images have been “photoshopped”, that such images are seldom if ever accepted at face value.
Social media has helped to expose “photography fakes” where social media bloggers have been caught out using “faked” backgrounds to their travel blogs. There appears to be a momentum to these exposé stories, possibly because people feel cheated or deceived by such posts. This would suggest an underlying belief in the truth of the photographic image (when not obviously manipulated) which is betrayed by the false claims of the photo editors.
We live today in the age of “fake news” society is becoming ever more doubting of news stories and associated imagery. This move to the denial or questioning of all photographic images is not necessarily positive. Rather like the fable “the boy that cried wolf” we now face the situation where genuine photojournalism is questioned or doubts cast by unscrupulous agents that devalue such images. An extreme of such behaviour being that images of the holocaust are denied or denounced as fabricated by holocaust deniers.
Not withstanding the herd cynicism highlighted above, before working on part one of this course I saw the terms photojournalism, documentary and reportage as having roughly the same meaning. I would have grouped all under the genre of “straight photography” meaning that the images would have recorded events accurately, truthfully and stand as a genuine record of moments in time. Oh foolish me!
Part one has introduced to me the subtle differences between between such terms. I say “subtle” because these terms are often used interchangeably, even by the photographers themselves. Additionally the “photographer’s voice” whereby a photographers image will to some extent expose the motivations or priorities of the photographer whether conscious or not will affect the “truth” of any image.
Of the three terms above Photojournalism has the closest links to accuracy and authenticity. The inclusion of the “journalism” is the clue here. Described in the Cambridge dictionary as “the work of collecting writing and publishing or broadcasting news stories and articles” photojournalists provide images for the news media. These images are often captured close to action or incidents, providing evidence or information to support news stories.
Documentary photography is a term often used to cover some or all of the other genres above, however significant differences between documentary and photojournalism photography will include; Documentary photography is often a step removed from the immediacy of “front line” journalism. Documentary photography often follows a predetermined agenda and is selective in the images captured to support that agenda. It may be social reform or raising the profile of important subjects. If photojournalists photograph the immediate impact of a natural disaster in another country whilst newsworthy, documentary photographers would be the people continuing to record the struggles of the people affected long after the journalists have left.
Photojournalism and documentary photographers are concerned with objective photography, whereas Reportage offers the photographer the opportunity for subjectivity in the presentation of their message. One famous exponent of reportage photography is Henri Cartier-Bresson who’s “decisive moment” work demonstrates how an image captured at the right moment may conote more than it denotes. Reportage photography provides the means for visual story telling and today this style is overy popular when used to capture the both the feeling and the actuality of weddings or other social events.
Bibliography
Wells L (ed.) (2009) Photography: a critical introduction, Routledge, Oxford; New York. pp.67-99
Clarke G (1997) The photograph, Oxford Press, New York. pp.207-208.
Bate D (2009) Photography the key concepts, Berg, Oxford. pp.53-65.


















































































